5 Mar
2009
5 Mar
'09
1:57 p.m.
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:55:21PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 12:03:35PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
That's why the clocking interface is generally used here - it's more orthogonal.
Hmm, how would you express 24 sample bits with 32 clocks per channel? I might not have gotten your point yet - could you provide an example?
You could add a "clock" which is the number of clocks per channel. It doesn't need to correspond to a literal clock in the hardware, it'd just provide a way of setting this number.