5 Mar
2009
5 Mar
'09
2:34 p.m.
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:21:26PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
I just saw that one of these bit fields we write to here is only available on PXA3xx - so we probably need the whole logic to be different for PXA2xx which makes everthing a lot more complicated.
At some point it's going to be better to just split the function using these into PXA2xx and PXA3xx variants.
Anyway, could the patch below be taken?
Yes, sure. Will apply.