At Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:56:20 +0100, samson.richard@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for your replies.
As Stephen Warren said, a patch with full support of 5xx cards will be more useful. I'll be able to write a new patch but I don't have the knowledge to get other IDs.
OK, Stephen, could you prepare the patch including all missing IDs?
thanks,
Takashi
Richard Samson
2011/2/28 Takashi Iwai tiwai@suse.de:
At Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:13:29 -0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
Richard Samson wrote at Sunday, February 27, 2011 6:11 PM:
... I added a new entry in patch_hdmi.c to get sound working on my own 560 Ti card :
--- patch_hdmi.c 2011-02-15 22:29:51.000000000 +0100 +++ patch_hdmi_GTX-560Ti.c 2011-02-27 23:52:56.984613414 +0100
...
patch_nvhdmi_8ch_89 }, { .id = 0x10de0014, .name = "GPU 14 HDMI/DP", .patch = patch_nvhdmi_8ch_89 }, +{ .id = 0x10de0016, .name = "GPU 16 HDMI/DP", .patch = patch_nvhdmi_8ch_89 }, { .id = 0x10de0018, .name = "GPU 18 HDMI/DP", .patch =
...
Acked-By: Stephen Warren swarren@nvidia.com
Hmm. When I submitted that last patch, I think I looked at the wrong branch of our Windows drivers, and hence missed a couple IDs, and added a couple of IDs that won't be used. Once this is merged, I'll follow up with another patch to fix the other issues (or let me know if you just want me to provide a single patch with everything in it, Takashi).
I don't mind in either way as long as it's a simple patch. As I already asked Richard for re-submitting with his sign-off, we can wait for a while.
BTW, this kind of id addition patch can be still merged in 2.6.38 if the chips listed there are real ones.
thanks,
Takashi