10 Sep
2010
10 Sep
'10
11:40 p.m.
В сообщении от 10 сентября 2010 11:43:14 автор Jassi Brar написал:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Mark Brown
broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:56:23PM +0900, Jassi Brar wrote:
I would like to have points to consider from every stakeholder.
I don't really have anything myself, though I may have some comments on the actual proposal I guess.
Btw, AC97, PCM and DMA were easy kill.
It's I2S that's PITA. I am thinking of leaving 24xx-i2s, i.e pre-64xx(shared with 2412), unchanged and letting them die of old age (obsoleted and dropped duly if no stakeholder keeps up).
Does it mean there's no one to support s3c24xx-i2s (for s3c24xx socs)?