On 02.10.2012 11:37, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:48:53AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
I also agree that ifdef is not a good solution. It is better to have this information passed as device_data and via DT it can be decided based on the compatible property for the device.
That's not really the problem here - the problem is that the APIs used to get the SRAM are DaVinci only so it's not possible to build on OMAP or other platforms. The SRAM code needs to move to a standard API.
What about following Matt Porter's idea and ignore the SRAM code entirely and port the entire PCM code to generic dmaengine code first? The EDMA driver needs to learn support for cyclic DMA for that, and I might give that a try in near future.
Later on, the SRAM ping-pong code can get added back using genalloc functions, as Sekhar proposed. That needs to be done by someone who has access to a Davinci board though, I only have a AM33xx/OMAP here.
Daniel