Hi,
cc'ing some ASOC reviewers.
On 25/4/19 18:00, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 4:19 AM Enric Balletbo i Serra enric.balletbo@collabora.com wrote:
Hi Gwendal, Lee
On 25/4/19 10:12, Lee Jones wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
The interface between CrosEC embedded controller and the host, described by cros_ec_commands.h, as diverged from what the embedded controller really support.
The source of thruth is at https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/platform/ec/+/master/include/ec...
That include file is converted to remove ACPI and Embedded only code.
From now on, cros_ec_commands.h will be automatically generated from the file above, do not modify directly.
Fell free to squash the commits below.
This is going to need a bunch of Chromium reviews (and testing ideally) before I can take this set.
I tested this patchset in different ways. With the full series applied I checked that didn't break any cros-ec driver on Kevin, Samus and Veyron devices. I also checked via userspace tool that I don't see any problem sending commands and finally I checked that applying one-by-one the patches didn't break the build on x86 and arm64, there is though, a problem,
[PATCH 24/30] mfd: cros_ec: Update I2S API
introduces a build problem because removes a struct that is currently used by the cros_ec_codec driver. I think that at the same time we should update that driver with the new struct name.
Sorry, I did not structure this patchset right. The i2s patch is available at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10877645/
I think would be better squash both patches, otherwise things like bisection would be a pain. The patch then touches two subsystems but won't break compilation, and is pretty simple, so I think should not be a problem go through i.e. the mfd tree.
Gwendal.
Once this is fixed,
Acked-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra enric.balletbo@collabora.com
for the full series.
Thanks, Enric