On 2/6/2020 11:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 04:03:34PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote:
Audio Hub (AHUB) comprises a collection of hardware accelerators for audio pre-processing and post-processing and a programmable full crossbar for audio routing across these accelerators. This patch adds YAML schema for DT binding of AHUB and few of its following components. These devices will be registered as ASoC components.
- ADMAIF
- I2S
- DMIC
- DSPK
Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar spujar@nvidia.com
.../bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra186-dspk.yaml | 105 +++++++++++++ .../bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-admaif.yaml | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++ .../bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-ahub.yaml | 130 ++++++++++++++++ .../bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-dmic.yaml | 105 +++++++++++++ .../bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-i2s.yaml | 112 ++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 617 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra186-dspk.yaml create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-admaif.yaml create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-ahub.yaml create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-dmic.yaml create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-i2s.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra186-dspk.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra186-dspk.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dc9fef3 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra186-dspk.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0)
. . .
- items:
- description: initial module clock rate- "#sound-dai-cells":
- const: 1
- sound-name-prefix:
- $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
- description:
Used as prefix for sink/source names of the component. Must be aunique string among multiple instances of the same component.The name can be "DSPK1" or "DSPKx", where x depends on the maximumSounds like a constraint.
Is there a better way to convey the recommended strings above?
All the other comments I will fix in next revision. Thanks. . . .