At Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:02:51 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
These patches fix cases where the return code appears to be unintentially nonnegative.
The patch 10/10 seems missing. Or are all 9 patches? The patch number suddenly changes to X/9 from 4.
In anyway, the patches 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are applied. I leave patches 1, 2 and 4 to Mark.
thanks,
Takashi
The complete semantic match that finds the problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl> @ok exists@ identifier f,ret,i; expression e; constant c; @@
f(...) { <+... ( return -c@i; | ret = -c@i; ... when != ret = e return ret; | if (ret < 0) { ... return ret; } ) ...+> }
@r exists@ identifier ret,l,ok.f; expression e1,e2,e3; statement S; position p1,p2,p3; @@
f(...) { ... when any ( if@p1 ((ret < 0|ret != 0)) { ... return ret; } | ret@p1 = 0 ) ... when != ret = e1 when != &ret ( if (<+... ret = e3 ...+>) S | if (<+... &ret ...+>) S | if@p2(...) { ... when != ret = e2 when forall return@p3 ret; } ) ... when any }
@bad exists@ position r.p1,r.p2; statement S1,S2; identifier r.ret; expression e1; @@
( if@p1 ((ret < 0|ret != 0)) S1 | ret@p1 = 0 ) ... when any ret = e1 ... when any if@p2(...) S2
@bad2@ position r.p1,r.p2; identifier r.ret; expression e1; statement S2; @@
ret@p1 = 0 ... when != if (...) { ... ret = e1 ... return ret; } when any if@p2(...) S2
@script:python depends on !bad && !bad2@ p1 << r.p1; p2 << r.p2; p3 << r.p3; @@
cocci.print_main("",p1) cocci.print_secs("",p2) cocci.print_secs("",p3) // </smpl>
Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel