4 Jun
2008
4 Jun
'08
3:51 p.m.
At Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:28:07 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 02:01:55PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Geoffrey Wossum wrote:
+struct at32_ssc_info {
- char *name;
- struct ssc_device *ssc;
- spinlock_t lock; /* lock for dir_mask */
Just wondering whether this lock is really needed. Is it really racy?
Bidirectional ports could be in two PCMs and have configuration happening simultaneously.
Fair enough.
But, it's no fast code path, and maybe one global mutex would be enough for such a purpose, though.
Takashi