On 07/25/2014 01:27 PM, Nicolin Chen wrote:
Hi Varka,
Thank you for the comments!
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 01:05:05PM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote:
On 07/25/2014 12:49 PM, Nicolin Chen wrote: (...)
+static const struct platform_device_id fsl_asrc_devtype[] = {
- {
.name = "imx35-asrc",.driver_data = IMX35_ASRC,- }, {
.name = "imx53-asrc",.driver_data = IMX53_ASRC,- }, {
/* sentinel */- }
+}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, fsl_asrc_devtype);
where are you using fsl_asrc_devtype,,,?
+static const struct of_device_id fsl_asrc_ids[] = {
- {
.compatible = "fsl,imx35-asrc",.data = &fsl_asrc_devtype[IMX35_ASRC],Ya here ... but what is the use...?
I got your point. I will drop all these and move ids behind probe/remove() as you suggested at the first place and then use of_device_is_compatible() inside the probe() instead.
- asrc_priv->regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk(&pdev->dev,
"mem", regs, &fsl_asrc_regmap_config);devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk(&pdev->dev, "mem", regs, &fsl_asrc_regmap_config);
I'll refine to
devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk(&pdev->dev, "mem", regs, &fsl_asrc_regmap_config);
- if (IS_ERR(asrc_priv->regmap)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to init regmap\n");return PTR_ERR(asrc_priv->regmap);- }
- irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
- if (irq < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no irq for node %s\n", np->full_name);return irq;- }
- ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, fsl_asrc_isr, 0,
asrc_priv->name, asrc_priv);same...
Sorry I don't see any problem with this devm_request_irq()...
Ohhh... This is the problem with my email client... Sorry...
Thanks...