9 Oct
2013
9 Oct
'13
4:59 p.m.
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:12:42PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 02:20:04PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean here. How would the error be handled without calling _STOP?
The START error should be handled in mxs_saif and there shouldn't be a _STOP call for mxs_saif_trigger afterwards to handle the failed START.
How would the framework know that the error has been handled - what tells it that the error returned is for an error that has been handled as opposed to an error that has not been handled?