On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:15:27 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
Because I didn't see any test result from you,
This is correct so far.
so I can't trust you.
This view did not hinder you to integrate some of my update suggestions which you found easier to handle.
The really trivial things are different. Don't mix up things.
Which test configurations would you trust finally?
Do test whatever like the users do.
I find such an information too unsafe for an official acceptance test.
No-testing is the worst case.
How can such descriptions improve the trust situation?
It's the first step. At least then I can see you did some test. Currently nothing. zero. nada.
I am unsure if acceptable test results will ever be published for this software module.
Then forget about your patches.
How can I trust it?
- Would you dare to inspect the shown source code adjustments again?
Not unless you give some testing results.
- How do you think about to sort the remaining update candidates by their change size (or software age)?
Irrelevant.
Takashi