On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 01:00:38 +0200, Yang, Libin wrote:
Hi Pierre,
-----Original Message----- From: Pierre-Louis Bossart [mailto:pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 11:03 PM To: Yang, Libin libin.yang@intel.com; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; tiwai@suse.de; broonie@kernel.org Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: codec: hdac_hdmi add device_link to card device
On 4/12/19 9:33 AM, Yang, Libin wrote:
>> + device_link_add(component->card->dev, &hdev->dev, > DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE | >> + DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER); > > Should device_link_free() be added to hdmi_codec_remove then?
As Takashi suggested, I add the DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER
flag.
This will make sure the link will be freed when machine driver are
removed.
And as machine driver depends on the hdac_hdmi module, when hdmi_codec_remove() is called, the link is freed already.
ok, maybe adding a comment would help dummies like me who didn't know about this flag? Thanks!
Thanks for suggestion. I will add the comment.
After a second thought, is there any possibility that the machine driver does not depend on the hdac_hdmi module? I checked our current driver, there is the dependency between machine driver and hdac_hdmi
module.
I don't get your question. All machine drivers supporting the iDISP link explicitly use a select HDAC_HDMI in the Kconfig and refer to DAIs created/exposed by the hdac_hdmi module.
So the dependency should always exists. I have checked all the machine drivers and they all depends on the hdac_hdmi if they are using it.
It's possible that the hdac_hdmi codec is probed as a result of the platform driver configuration but the machine driver does not support HDMI. In that case, is there any issue with your solution?
If machine driver doesn't support HDMI, component will never be called. It is safe.
Hi Takashi,
My patch doesn't use component->init() as you suggested. But they should be similar. Are you OK with this patch?
Yes.
Takashi