On Thu, 2022-08-04 at 14:33 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 09:21:37PM +0800, chunxu.li wrote:
On Thu, 2022-08-04 at 13:41 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 05:13:59PM +0800, Chunxu Li wrote:
.board = "mediatek,mt8186",.sof_tplg_filename = "sof-mt8186.tplg",The mediatek,mt8186 compatible looks like a SoC compatible not a board compatible...
Our dts config as below: kingler board: compatible = "google,corsola", "google,kingler", "mediatek,mt8186"; krabby board: compatible = "google,corsola", "google,krabby", "mediatek,mt8186";
So the SoC is listed as a fallback for the board and things work out fine.
Which of the two approaches do you prefer?
I think it would be clearer to keep what's being matched the same but rename the .board field to be .compatible, or possibly .system_compatible or something if it's unclear what's being matched. That'd be more normal for specifying a compatible string anyway.
Appreciated for you advice, I'll rename the .board to .compatible as following:
+ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186", + .sof_tplg_filename = "sof-mt8186.tplg",