28 Jan
2011
28 Jan
'11
2:12 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 02:54:05PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
This fixes a regression introduced by: 97404f2e0386ac147cec00fc5d89ea475b04bd78 ASoC: Do DAPM control updates in the middle of DAPM sequences
This would be *much* easier to review if you'd mentioned what the issue you're fixing is... I think the changelog should be something along the lines of:
snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw() has variables for both the unshifted and shifted mask for updates commit 97404f (ASoC: Do DAPM control updates in the middle of DAPM sequences) got confused between the two of these. Since there's no need to keep a copy of the unshifted mask fix this and simplify the code by using only one mask variable.