At Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:21:30 +0100, Rene Herman wrote:
On 14-11-07 09:25, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:01:31 -0800 (PST), David Miller wrote:
From: David Miller davem@davemloft.net Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:56:57 -0800 (PST)
The fact that it farts at me every time I post to this thread.
See? I got another one and I have received at least 10 of the following over the past 2 days.
That's rediculious.
And because a human adds the whitelist this is always going to happen to someone when they start posting to the alsa list for the first time.
... if you give too many recipients in your post. That is often really annoying thing to me, together with keeping the unrelated subject line ;)
I personally don't care whether it's a moderated or open list. We chose it simply due to too bad S/N ratio at that time. So, if the current list annoys your or many others and the list management on vger is so good, it'd be basically a good move, of course. I'll appreciate it.
The only confusion would be the change of ML address, but we can do it slowly, too.
I'd love the lists at vger. Amazing spam-filtering. I'd like to request the name alsa-devel@vger.kernel.org (and alsa-user@vger.kernel.org if at all possible so we can open that one up as well) though.
I think alsa-user can stay as is. It's no place for dragging many other addresses like alsa-devel.
BTW, I also prefer keeping the name alsa-devel@. It's been so.
There wouldn't need to be a forced ML address change if Jaroslov would then just rewrite alsa-{devel,user}@alsa-project.org to vger.kernel.org same as he did for alsa-devel and does for alsa-user to @lists.sf.net.
If it works, then I'm for it, too.
thanks,
Takashi