On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com wrote:
+#include <linux/platform_data/x86/clk-byt-plt.h>
This was a suggestion of Darren Hart in agreement with Thomas Gleixner. see http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-October/113936.htm...
Darren, did we get your proposal right?
Is it indeed platform data? I would not create platform_data/x86 without strong argument. Perhaps include/linux/clk/x86_pmc.h? (Yes, I know about clk-lpss.h which is old enough and was basically first try of clk stuff on x86)
Looking more into the patch I got another question. Do we really need a platform driver for that?
That's what I think motivated me for the header location. And that's why I asked about use of the driver/clock provider in the latter patch.
If the answer is yes, then I doubt which location is preferable, otherwise include/clk/x86_*.h looks appropriate.
Sorry if I wasn't clear in the first place.