Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 4:30 PM cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:

From: Minghao Chi chi.minghao@zte.com.cn

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate for simplifing code

Reported-by: Zeal Robot zealci@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi chi.minghao@zte.com.cn

Acked-by: Shengjiu Wang shengjiu.wang@gmail.com

Best regards Wang Shengjiu

---

sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c index ed444e8f1d6b..1a2bdf8e76f0 100644 --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c @@ -1050,11 +1050,9 @@ static int fsl_esai_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err_pm_disable; }

•   ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
  

•   if (ret < 0) {
  

•           pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
  

•   ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
  

•   if (ret < 0)
            goto err_pm_get_sync;
  

•   }
  
    ret = fsl_esai_hw_init(esai_priv);
    if (ret)
  

-- 2.25.1