These two bug are here: list_for_each_entry_safe_continue(w, n, list, power_list); list_for_each_entry_safe_continue(w, n, list, power_list);
After the list_for_each_entry_safe_continue() exits, the list iterator will always be a bogus pointer which point to an invalid struct objdect containing HEAD member. The funciton poniter 'w->event' will be a invalid value which can lead to a control-flow hijack if the 'w' can be controlled.
The original intention was to continue the outer list_for_each_entry_safe() loop with the same entry if w->event is NULL, but misunderstanding the meaning of list_for_each_entry_safe_continue().
So just add a 'continue;' to fix the bug.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 163cac061c973 ("ASoC: Factor out DAPM sequence execution") Signed-off-by: Xiaomeng Tong xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com ---
changes since v1: - use continue statement instead (Mark Brown)
v1:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220327082138.13696-1-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com/
--- sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c index b06c5682445c..fb43b331a36e 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c @@ -1687,8 +1687,7 @@ static void dapm_seq_run(struct snd_soc_card *card, switch (w->id) { case snd_soc_dapm_pre: if (!w->event) - list_for_each_entry_safe_continue(w, n, list, - power_list); + continue;
if (event == SND_SOC_DAPM_STREAM_START) ret = w->event(w, @@ -1700,8 +1699,7 @@ static void dapm_seq_run(struct snd_soc_card *card,
case snd_soc_dapm_post: if (!w->event) - list_for_each_entry_safe_continue(w, n, list, - power_list); + continue;
if (event == SND_SOC_DAPM_STREAM_START) ret = w->event(w,