The patch
ASoC: soc-core: add snd_soc_del_component_unlocked()
has been applied to the asoc tree at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-5.5
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
From 486c7978ff665eb763f70cc9477e0de6326e1c41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:46:39 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-core: add snd_soc_del_component_unlocked()
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and is difficult to debug.
Now ALSA SoC has snd_soc_add_component(), but there is no paired snd_soc_del_component(). Thus, snd_soc_unregister_component() is calling cleanup function randomly. it is difficult to read. This patch adds missing snd_soc_del_component_unlocked() and balance up code.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8736f23jn4.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org --- sound/soc/soc-core.c | 20 +++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c index acbaed4e4e9d..e91325b688f2 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c @@ -2764,12 +2764,7 @@ static void snd_soc_component_add(struct snd_soc_component *component) mutex_unlock(&client_mutex); }
-static void snd_soc_component_cleanup(struct snd_soc_component *component) -{ - snd_soc_unregister_dais(component); -} - -static void snd_soc_component_del_unlocked(struct snd_soc_component *component) +static void snd_soc_component_del(struct snd_soc_component *component) { struct snd_soc_card *card = component->card;
@@ -2823,6 +2818,12 @@ static void snd_soc_try_rebind_card(void) list_del(&card->list); }
+static void snd_soc_del_component_unlocked(struct snd_soc_component *component) +{ + snd_soc_unregister_dais(component); + snd_soc_component_del(component); +} + int snd_soc_add_component(struct device *dev, struct snd_soc_component *component, const struct snd_soc_component_driver *component_driver, @@ -2855,7 +2856,7 @@ int snd_soc_add_component(struct device *dev, return 0;
err_cleanup: - snd_soc_component_cleanup(component); + snd_soc_del_component_unlocked(component); err_free: return ret; } @@ -2893,15 +2894,12 @@ static int __snd_soc_unregister_component(struct device *dev) if (dev != component->dev) continue;
- snd_soc_component_del_unlocked(component); + snd_soc_del_component_unlocked(component); found = 1; break; } mutex_unlock(&client_mutex);
- if (found) - snd_soc_component_cleanup(component); - return found; }