27 Mar
2014
27 Mar
'14
12:26 p.m.
Hi Peter,
On 03/27/2014 10:56 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 03/27/2014 11:49 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
- u32 val = 0;
- u8 *bytes = (u8*) &val;
Would it be better to call these variables as: u32 cs; /* as in Channel Status */ u8 *cs_bytes = (u8*) &cs; /* Channel Status in bytes */
Without the comments of course. Sorry, I did not noticed this previously...
No problem. v3 coming up.
Otherwise it looks good, does it work? ;)
It does! :)
Daniel