23 Jun
2020
23 Jun
'20
1:35 p.m.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 4:55 PM Markus Elfring Markus.Elfring@web.de wrote:
clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare check the input clock parameter in the beginning of the function,
These functions call further functions which perform null pointer checks.
if the parameter is NULL, clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare will return immediately.
The interpretation of these function implementations seems to be reasonable. Would you like to achieve any improvements for the corresponding software documentation?
Which document do you mean?
So Don't need to check input clock parameters before calling clk API.
What do you find imperative in this wording?
Another wording alternative: Thus omit extra null pointer checks before four function calls.
Regards, Markus