24 Jun
2013
24 Jun
'13
6:46 p.m.
On 24.06.2013 18:05, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 04:25:28PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
The property 'ti,charge-period' must be given in nanoseconds, not microseconds.
Applied al, thanks. Though specifying this in nanoseconds does seem absurdly high resolution...
Meh, I was confused, sorry. That first patch need to be revered (or dropped), the documentation was correct as it stood. The time values are given in fractions of milliseconds, not microseconds. My bad.
Not sure where the "codecs: " in the subject line came from either.
No problem, I can drop that in my future submissions.
Thanks, Daniel