On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Mark Brown broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:49:03PM +0900, jassi brar wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Mark Brown
I agree that this is the only really controversial change, but it seemed like pretty much all the changes that added stuff to the headers or used them could've been done pre-move so that they didn't depend on it.
Not sure which patch you point, but it was decision of logical build-up and successful compilation after each patch that made the patch series as it is now.
Pretty much all of them - for example, patch 11 adds a bunch of new bitfield definitions to the header. This change didn't really need the header to have been moved before it was made, it could have been done pre-move.
Dear that wud have defeated the very purpose of header moving -- don't wanna depend on changes surfacing via ARCH tree after too long.