At Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:34:51 +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
2010-09-02 11:26, Pacho Ramos skrev:
El jue, 02-09-2010 a las 10:29 +0200, Takashi Iwai escribió:
Rejected by SPF lookup: (recv=llar.net.uniovi.es, send-ip=195.135.220.2) Could not find a valid SPF record User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.1 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) References: 1283357723.8159.4.camel@localhost.localdomain
At Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:15:23 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
This is an old problem I am suffering since kernel-2.6.32 and that is still unresolved even with 2.6.35 and alsa-utils-1.0.23: http://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg31422.html
If you follow the thread, it got stalled in: http://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg31433.html
In summary, I get the following: # alsactl -f /etc/asound.state restore /dev/snd/controlC0 Unknown hardware: "VIA8237" "Realtek ALC658D" "AC97a:414c4781" "0x147b" "0x1415" Hardware is initialized using a guess method # echo $? 99
This is no error. It means that alsactl has no special workaround for your hardware. The return code of alsactl looks strange. I thought Jaroslav has already fixed it, though...
Takashi
Well, Jaroslav fixed it to use "99" instead of "157": http://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg31430.html
And, about the message, could it be reworded for preventing to make users think their hardware is "Unknown"? Maybe it could simply show "No workaround needed for: ..." instead of "Unknown hardware"
Perhaps "Generic" hardware?
Sounds reasonable.
thanks,
Takashi