27 Sep
2010
27 Sep
'10
10:58 a.m.
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 10:30 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Yeah, I do understand the initial intention, but size_t for such a case (just for an index of a small fixed size array) is obviously too much. If it must be size_t, it shouldn't be a variable name like "i" but a more specific name.
I see your point. Makes sense.
Cheers, Dimitrios