6 Nov
2008
6 Nov
'08
12:03 p.m.
At Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:49:06 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:35:01PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Mark Brown wrote:
return score;
- return 0xffffffff;
-1 would be simpler and safer (for possible missing f's).
I'm not sure that'd add to the clarity - the goal isn't to have all bits set, the goal is to have a much larger score than could ever otherwise be achieved so putting in a very large constant expresses that much more directly.
In that case, the best form is UINT_MAX.
Takashi