1 May
2024
1 May
'24
9:56 a.m.
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:10:27 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...) if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code self explaining.
Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
Thanks, applied now to for-next branch.
Takashi