5 Aug
2010
5 Aug
'10
1:10 p.m.
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 04:15:36PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Mark Brown
The symmetric_rates infrastructure was only ever really intended to work over a single DAI so I'd not be at all surprised if it gets a little confused (though I'm surprised it's doing anything at all).
Makes sense. Should I forget the symmetric_rates feature and just handle it internally in my driver?
It would seem more sensible to enhance symmetric_rates.