9 Oct
2009
9 Oct
'09
7:19 p.m.
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 04:36:16PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Well it is very unlikely that something like this could ever happen since the tpa6130a2_channel_enable and the tpa6130a2_power is called when DAPM is enabling/disabling the path. I think in a middle of enable or disable there should not be any opposite operation running in DAPM...
DAPM guarantees single threadedness - DAPM itself would get confused if there were more than one power update in progress at once.