On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:54:47AM +0530, rajeev wrote:
On 4/11/2011 8:26 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:00:00AM +0530, Rajeev Kumar wrote:
+static const char *op_mode_text[] = { "slave", "master"};
What is op_mode? This sounds like it should be configured by set_dai_fmt()...
OK, I will change the name.
You're missing the point here. The name isn't an issue.
This patch set has been compiled and tested for Linux-kernel-version 2.6.38-rc4, since SPEAr patches for this linux version are already under review in Russel King's ARM branch.This version does not have snd_soc_cache_sync() function.
This isn't how mainline works. You're not submitting code against some old, released kernel version. You're submitting code for the development version of the kernel and need to fit in with that. Code for an older kernel may not even compile with current development kernels. For integration testing -next is often a good bet.