25 Nov
2010
25 Nov
'10
10:48 a.m.
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 17:23 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
We call snd_soc_register_dais() in sh4_soc_dai_probe(), thus we should call snd_soc_unregister_dais() in sh4_soc_dai_remove().
Otherwise, we got "too many arguments to function 'snd_soc_unregister_dai'" error message.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel.lin@gmail.com
sound/soc/sh/ssi.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/ssi.c b/sound/soc/sh/ssi.c index 40bbdf1..05192d9 100644 --- a/sound/soc/sh/ssi.c +++ b/sound/soc/sh/ssi.c @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int __devinit sh4_soc_dai_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int __devexit sh4_soc_dai_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) {
- snd_soc_unregister_dai(&pdev->dev, ARRAY_SIZE(sh4_ssi_dai));
- snd_soc_unregister_dais(&pdev->dev, ARRAY_SIZE(sh4_ssi_dai)); return 0;
}
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood lrg@slimlogic.co.uk
--
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk