On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 12:17:07PM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:18:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:48:42AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 04:38:38PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Ah, ok, so it's for enabling real hardware, not just a cleanup, right? You might want to put that info into the boilerplate mail or so.
I'm perfectly fine with all the patches that touch x86 code:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org
I suppose you'd like to have these in the driver tree, all in one place?
Thanks,
Ingo
Ah yes, in retrospect I should have made it clear that this was for supporting hardware rather than simply code cleanup. That was an oversight on my part not to have made it more explicit.
Introducing everything to the driver tree would be most convenient, thus allowing me to quickly release my subsequent patches which will be rebased on top of these.
Ok, I can take these.
thanks,
greg k-h
Forgive me for probing again; what is that status of this patchset? I'm anxious to see them accepted to prevent the regression introduced by the ISA_BUS configuration option from appearing in the next merge window.
Not all of these patches had anything to do with the subject of this 0/4 patch, and seem to have gone in through other trees.
So can you resend just the patches that are for this series that have not been picked up?
thanks,
greg k-h