At Fri, 08 Nov 2013 11:55:17 +0100, John Spencer wrote:
Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
Date 7.11.2013 21:04, Joe Perches wrote:
Jaroslav hasn't acked or signed a patch in quite awhile.
It does not mean that I'm not willing to continue the kernel code maintenance when Takashi is offline. Keep me in. You may reorder M: lines.
Jaroslav, care to answer my question i asked you in July?
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2013-July/064402.html
it's important, as it's one of the last hurdles preventing alsa-lib from compiling out-of-the-box against musl libc.
It's not good to hijack a thread...
In anyway, could you just submit a fix patch? Guarding with __GLIBC__ alone would be enough, I guess. That is,
#ifdef __GLIBC__ #if !defined(_POSIX_C_SOURCE) && !defined(_POSIX_SOURCE) ....
Takashi