On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 10:01 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
Il 08/07/22 04:46, Zhongjun Tan ha scritto:
From: Zhongjun Tan tanzhongjun@coolpad.com
Remove condition with no effect
Signed-off-by: Zhongjun Tan tanzhongjun@coolpad.com
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c index db71b032770d..6be6d4f3b585 100644 --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-adda.c @@ -295,8 +295,6 @@ static int mtk_adda_pad_top_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w, case SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU: if (afe_priv->mtkaif_protocol == MTKAIF_PROTOCOL_2_CLK_P2) regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP, 0x39);
else if (afe_priv->mtkaif_protocol ==MTKAIF_PROTOCOL_2)
regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP,0x31);
I think that this needs some clarification from MediaTek: was 0x31 a typo here?
Regards, Angelo
Hi Angelo,
This patch can be accepted. The 0x31 is not typo, the logic of this code is not concise enough.
Thanks, Jiaxin.Yu
else regmap_write(afe->regmap, AFE_AUD_PAD_TOP,0x31); break;