On Tuesday 29 April 2014 12:57:24 Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 04/29/2014 12:37 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 29 April 2014 07:07:33 Alexander Shiyan wrote:
Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:12:14 +0200 от Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de:
On Tuesday 29 April 2014 00:35:41 Alexander Shiyan wrote:
So, I don't understand why this error happen, as well as I can not reproduce this...
It's probably CONFIG_SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA=m and CONFIG_SND_SOC_FSL_SSI=y then. What is the intended behavior in this case? Should CONFIG_SND_SOC_FSL_SSI be forced to be a module as well?
Hmm, yes... I thought that I had already solved a similar problem for the earlier version of the patch ...
How about this?
Having FSL_SSI/FSL_SPDIF, but not SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA does not make sense on iMX. So how about:
select SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA if SND_IMX_SOCand remove all the other 'select SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA' statements. That's in my opinion much nicer.
Yes, makes sense. Should I do another version of the patch?
Arnd