30 Jun
2022
30 Jun
'22
2:15 p.m.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 6:37 PM Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 01:39:11PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
+static int fsl_micfil_reparent_rootclk(struct fsl_micfil *micfil,
unsigned int sample_rate)
+{
struct device *dev = &micfil->pdev->dev;u64 ratio = sample_rate;struct clk *clk;int ret;/* Reparent clock if required condition is true */if (!micfil->pll8k_clk || !micfil->pll11k_clk)return 0;ratio = do_div(ratio, 8000) ? CLK_11K_FREQ : CLK_8K_FREQ;/* Get root clock */clk = micfil->mclk;if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk)) {dev_err(dev, "no mclk clock in devicetree\n");return PTR_ERR(clk);}/* Disable clock first, for it was enabled by pm_runtime */clk_disable_unprepare(clk);fsl_asoc_reparent_pll_clocks(dev, clk, micfil->pll8k_clk,micfil->pll11k_clk, ratio);ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);if (ret)return ret;return 0;+}
Seems like more of this logic could be factored out into the reparent function if the target sample rate is passed in?
Yes, let me update.
Best regards Wang Shengjiu