At Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:16:28 +0400, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Hi,
Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:37:45PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
You mean both patches (spitz: MONO -> MONO1 and wm8750: add missing VREF)? Anyway, a bit more detailed changelog is needed - what's broken in the real use and how fixed.
The long description is exactly what's broken - the names are wrong or undeclared and since DAPM works based on the control names this causes the drivers to fail to initialise DAPM for the device concerned. It's pretty much equivalent to C code referencing an undeclared variable.
I saw these patches got merged into asoc/dev tree. Should I repost them with more descriptive changelog, or are them suitable as is?
I already merged the patch "wm8750: it's MONO1, not MONO", but other two are still pending. Please give some descriptions in the changelog to each of these two patches and repost.
thanks,
Takashi