21 Oct
2011
21 Oct
'11
1:05 p.m.
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 11:24 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 03:19:15PM +0530, Ashish Chavan wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 10:00 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
That'd be fine but there's no DAPM code in the patch, only code to unconditionally enable on init.
Yes, because DAPM part for those IOs is already covered by DAPM patch.
Ah, you should split that out of the DAPM patch into here - the DAPM bit won't work without the enable bits (as I understand it).
Yes, your understanding is correct. Actually I acted bit lazy here by not splitting, assuming that both patches are going to get merged shortly. Do you think is it mandatory to do that? Or can I repost the patch after just resolving merge issue?
Thanks,
-- Ashish (GNU FAN)