9 Jun
2015
9 Jun
'15
4:13 p.m.
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 05:00:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 04:16:56PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
- ret = wm_adsp2_codec_probe(&priv->core.adsp[0], codec);
- if (ret)
return ret;I'm still not a big fan of the double registration that's being done - if nothing else the fact that it's not also factoring out the creation of the DSP controls seems wrong.
I don't see the point of trying to fight against the design of ASoC with the second probe. ASoC gives us what we need at the codec_probe stage so why try to invent something different?