On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:19:55 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
How would you notice that a corresponding system test worked in reasonable ways?
It needs a trust to the patch author or the tester who reported that it worked.
Can this aspect vary over time?
Not really.
The test result should be mentioned concisely.
How do you think about to introduce accepted automatic test procedures?
If *you* do introduce automatic testing for *your* patches, then I appreciate it.
You shouldn't rely on my system.
Did this system get sufficient trust so far?
I can trust my system for my purpose.
The main point is your patch itself; make your patch more reliable.
It seems that I can make my adjustments only a bit more interesting by positive review comments from other contributors (if you can not become convinced by the concrete source code changes).
Yes.
Takashi