21 Jul
2023
21 Jul
'23
2:58 p.m.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 12:58:14PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 12:42:08 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 12:08:46PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 12:01:46 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
While I see the benefit, I feel this is very confusing. If we use the API for a generic use, it should be renamed at first.
Any suggestion for the name?
It's a universal pointer... uniptr_t? Or a generic pointer, genptr_t?
I'm not good at naming, and I'm open for it.
It seems it's already spread enough with this name, I would rather stick with it for now (besides net it's used in crypto, nvme, and security).
The (new) callback though makes a lot of sense on its own.
What do you think?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko