On 23/02/2022 22:51, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
In subject, to match drivers/pci/ convention, do something like:
PCI: Use driver_set_override() instead of open-coding
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 08:13:04PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Use a helper for seting driver_override to reduce amount of duplicated code.
s/seting/setting/
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com
drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 24 ++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c index 602f0fb0b007..16a163d4623e 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c @@ -567,31 +567,15 @@ static ssize_t driver_override_store(struct device *dev, const char *buf, size_t count) { struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
- char *driver_override, *old, *cp;
int ret;
/* We need to keep extra room for a newline */ if (count >= (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) return -EINVAL;
This check makes no sense in the new function. Michael alluded to this as well.
I am not sure if I got your comment properly. You mean here: 1. Move this check to driver_set_override()? 2. Remove the check entirely?
- driver_override = kstrndup(buf, count, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!driver_override)
return -ENOMEM;- cp = strchr(driver_override, '\n');
- if (cp)
*cp = '\0';- device_lock(dev);
- old = pdev->driver_override;
- if (strlen(driver_override)) {
pdev->driver_override = driver_override;- } else {
kfree(driver_override);pdev->driver_override = NULL;- }
- device_unlock(dev);
- kfree(old);
ret = driver_set_override(dev, &pdev->driver_override, buf);
if (ret)
return ret;return count;
}
2.32.0
linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Best regards, Krzysztof