9 Aug
2018
9 Aug
'18
6:52 a.m.
On Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:11:48 +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comment with a proper "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114889 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva gustavo@embeddedor.com
Applied, thanks.
Takashi