On 10. 5. 2023, at 9:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org wrote:
On 09/05/2023 17:34, Martin Povišer wrote:
A bunch of TI's codecs have binding schemas which force #sound-dai-cells to one despite those codecs only having a single DAI. Allow for bindings with zero DAI cells and deprecate the former non-zero value.
Signed-off-by: Martin Povišer povik+lin@cutebit.org
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/tas2562.yaml | 6 ++++-- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/tas2770.yaml | 6 ++++-- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/tas27xx.yaml | 6 ++++-- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/tas2562.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/tas2562.yaml index a5bb561bfcfb..31a3024ea789 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/tas2562.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/tas2562.yaml @@ -55,7 +55,9 @@ properties: description: TDM TX current sense time slot.
'#sound-dai-cells':
- const: 1
- # The codec has a single DAI, the #sound-dai-cells=<1>; case is left in for backward
- # compatibility but is deprecated.
- enum: [0, 1]
Does it? I see playback and capture.
I think so. Playback and capture are not separate DAIs.
Martin
Best regards, Krzysztof