6 Feb
2020
6 Feb
'20
2:57 p.m.
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:36:04PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2020-02-06 11:46 am, Mark Brown wrote:
This makes sense but it is an ABI break so is going to need quirking for existing boards that unfortunately rely on the existing behaviour.
I guess the existing (mis)behaviour could be predicated on an of_machine_is_compatible() check for Rock64 boards - it's ugly, but should do the job if you feel it's more important to be 100% strict about not regressing supported systems for any possible kernel/DTB combination.
Yes, that's what I'm suggesting - we don't need to be exhaustive but having an obvious place for people to put the quirk in if they are affected is much better practice than just silently letting things break.