At Wed, 27 May 2015 07:40:24 +0000, Jie, Yang wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Takashi Iwai [mailto:tiwai@suse.de] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 3:23 PM To: Jie, Yang Cc: Sudip Mukherjee; broonie@kernel.org; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Girdwood, Liam R; Zhang, Vivian Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ALSA: set no sound proc fs for reduced memory footprint
At Wed, 27 May 2015 07:09:24 +0000, Jie, Yang wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Takashi Iwai [mailto:tiwai@suse.de] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 2:19 PM To: Jie, Yang Cc: Sudip Mukherjee; broonie@kernel.org; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Girdwood, Liam R; Zhang, Vivian Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ALSA: set no sound proc fs for reduced memory footprint
At Wed, 27 May 2015 05:38:01 +0000, Jie, Yang wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Sudip Mukherjee [mailto:sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:50 PM To: Jie, Yang Cc: tiwai@suse.de; broonie@kernel.org; alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org; Girdwood, Liam R; Zhang, Vivian Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ALSA: set no sound proc fs for reduced memory footprint
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 09:13:57PM +0800, Jie Yang wrote: > Disable sound proc fs, when CONFIG_SND_NO_PROC_FS is
selected,
> which can save about 9KB memory size for reducing memory > footprint
purpose.
> --- missing Signed-off-by.
Thanks for pointing out.
Signed-off-by: Jie Yang yang.jie@intel.com
Takashi, do I need to resend them?
Yes, but you seen to have missed my first comment. Here again:
Sorry about the missing. :)
==========================================================
======
+menuconfig SND_REDUCED_MEMORY_FOOTPRINT
- bool "Reduced Memory Footprint Support"
- default n
- help
Say 'Y' to enable Reduced Memory Footprint Support, which mayreduce code size and data footprint as much as possible.I'd like to move this into sound/core. Also, the kconfig name appears a bit too lengthy to me.
==========================================================
======
And, after reading this again, I wonder whether we just take the existing CONFIG_EXPERT for allowing the selection of more knobs like CONFIG_SND_PROC_FS.
SND_PROC_FS bool "Sound proc file" if EXPERT
Sounds good. Then we don't need 'SND_REDUCED_MEMORY_FOOTPRINT' any more? Or we can keep it as root menu of the set of items, just as
below?
(I changed it to SND_SMALL_FOOTPRINT, as your comment above)
I originally thought to select items from SND_SMALL_FOOTPRINT, but this doesn't seem to work. At least, "de"selecting isn't supported by Kconfig (i.e. set SND_PROC_FS=n when SND_SMALL_FOOTPRINT=y). We may have SND_NO_PROC_FS and select it, but it's too bad.
So, IMO, we can drop SND_SMALL_FOOTPRINT but let users choose each knob when EXPERT=y.
Firstly, I used sound/Kconfig but not sound/core/Kconfig, because some efforts for reducing footprint are based on sound/asoc/(e.g. dapm, dpcm, ...).
sound/core/Kconfig defines the core sound components and configurations, so it's more appropriate.
Secondly, if we drop SND_SMALL_FOOTPRINT, then we have to add several(may up to ~10) knobs under the sound menu(Sound Card Support), which looks messy and not neat.
The question is whether we want more selectable knobs. If you got for simplicity, SND_PROC_FS shouldn't be selectable either, but just give SND_SMALL_FOOTPRINT selectable.
Takashi