On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 11:13 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 11:24:59 +0200, focus.luo wrote:
On 2016年08月09日 16:01, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 09:47:48 +0200, Liam Girdwood wrote:
On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 09:10 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 05:00:24 +0200, focus.luo@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Focus Luo focus.luo@intel.com
This patch includes automated test scripts for linux audio driver based on alsa-lib interface by using alsabat as test tool. It supports analog and display(HDMI/DP) audio test. The package needs the alsa-utils, alsa-lib installed environment.
Signed-off-by: Focus Luo focus.luo@intel.com
You need to modify Makefile.am, too. Otherwise these contents won't be included in the release.
Where would be a good place to install the scripts ? I think the intention from Focus is that these are local scripts for use by devs and not really for everyone. They could perhaps go in ${prefix}/share/alsa/abat/tests ?
Well, if this is merely an example, we don't have to install it, but just keep it in tarball, too.
In future, we will continue to add/update some scripts in the the folder of "/alsa-utils/bat/tests" for alsabat. So would it be better to keep it as folder but not tarball?
No, I meant that your contents won't be included in alsa-utils release unless you add properly to Makefile.am. automake won't pack the unlisted files via "make dist".
Focus, you will need to add the scripts using automake (to Makefile.am) e.g.
noinst_SCRIPTS = \ script1 \ script2