On 8 Jun 2010, at 20:27, Ryan Mallon wrote:
Okay, I have Liam and Hartley's acks on this one and Liam's on 3/3. Mark, do you want to apply the other two patches to your tree, or should they go via the arm tree?
I don't urgently mind for patch 1 since there's no build time dependency - in order to avoid possible merge issues in the ARM tree it's as well if it goes that way, though I can pick it up if it makes sense for you guys to keep stuff together and you don't anticipate colliding with any work in the arch/arm code for the CPU.
Patch 3 I'll apply to ASoC tomorrow, it depends on the I2S driver for the CPU which is most definitely ASoC (and it's going to get caught up in the multi-CODEC API changes soon as well so would get build issues in -next if merged via a different tree anyway).