Certainly, I should be able test it sometime later today. I'll let you know the results.
I'm wondering how common this configuration is on Asus systems - that is, if the asus model should be the rule for Asus rather than the exception for a few specific ones. When I have some free time, maybe I'll delve into the alsa-info database to see what's been reported there. I suppose it could also be handled generically by checking to see if mics are on nodes 0x1a, 0x1b, 0x1c, 0x1d, and/or 0x23, and automatically selecting the correct automic logic based on that.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:43 AM, David Henningsson david.henningsson@canonical.com wrote:
On 2011-01-24 13:52, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:12:39 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
On 2011-01-22 17:31, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:46:00 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701271
This new model, named "asus", is identical to the "hp_laptop" model, except for the location of the internal mic, which is at pin 0x1a. It is used for Asus K52JU and Lenovo G560.
Signed-off-by: David Henningssondavid.henningsson@canonical.com
Applied, but to topic/asoc branch, as these involve rewrites. Thanks.
You mean the topic/hda branch, right?
Argh, yes, of course...
Does this mean it'll not be in 2.6.38, and will it be if I provide a backport for the second patch?
Right.
Ok, here's a backport, although untested since I don't have the hardware here. Andy, would it be possible for you to test it for me?
-- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. http://launchpad.net/~diwic